NEW DELHI: Supreme Court Friday said right to live in a pollution free atmosphere was a part of the fundamental right as it struck down Centre’s office memorandum allowing ex post facto or retrospective environmental clearances to projects in violation of norms.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan made scathing remarks in its judgement delivered on a plea filed by Vanashakti organisation and said, “Union govt, as much as individual citizens, has a constitutional obligation to protect the environment.”
The court said it “must come down very heavily” on Centre’s attempt to do “something which is completely prohibited under the law”. It added, “Cleverly, the words ex post facto have not been used, but without using those words, there is a provision to effectively grant ex post facto EC. The 2021 OM has been issued in violation of the decisions of this court….”
The bench, therefore, declared the 2021 office memorandum (OM) and related circulars “arbitrary, illegal, and contrary to Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Notification, 2006”. Centre, as a result, was restrained from issuing directions for grant of ex post facto clearances in any form or manner or for regularising the acts done in contravention of the EIA notification.
You may also like
Poland Presidential Elections 2025: What we all know about polls, contenders, and key decisive factors
After objecting, Cong now says listed party leaders to accompany Op Sindoor outreach mission
Half of adults have 'break-up fund' as couples admit money secrets
'Players decide who takes penalties', says Guardiola after FA Cup final loss to Palace
'Narad Muni Politics': Congress Slams BJP For Including Shashi Tharoor In Operation Sindoor Delegation Without Consultation
